New case study: NVIDIA HQ – The AI-Powered Smart WorkplaceRead more
Spaceti

Updated September 2026 · 2 min read

Your Office Feels Full. The Data Says Otherwise

Article summary

Most offices appear busier than they actually are. According to CBRE, global average office utilization in 2026 is 53% — meaning the typical office is empty for nearly half the working day, even when it feels crowded.

So why does the office feel full when half the desks are empty?

The office feels full because of how people behave, not how space is actually used. Ghost bookings lock desks and rooms that nobody shows up to. Peak-hour arrivals create a busy illusion that disappears by early afternoon. And because most organizations measure bookings rather than actual presence, the data reinforces the illusion rather than challenging it.

The numbers behind the feeling

Global average office utilization has risen to 53% in 2026, up from 38% in 2024, according to CBRE's 2026 Global Workplace & Occupancy Insights report. That means even with return-to-office mandates accelerating, the average office sits empty for nearly half the working day.

In the US, attendance has recovered to around 80% of pre-pandemic levels according to Marcus & Millichap — but pre-pandemic offices were already running at 40–60% utilization. 80% of a number that was already low is still a lot of empty space.

Three reasons the office feels fuller than it is

  1. Ghost bookings inflate perceived demand A reservation is intent, not proof of use. When a meeting room shows as booked for three hours but sits empty for two of them, your utilization data is measuring what people planned — not what they did. Without sensors that track actual presence, your numbers are wrong by design.
  2. Peak hours mask the daily average If 80% of your staff arrive between 9am and 10am, the office will look full during that window. But if most people leave by 3pm, your average daily occupancy may be 30 points lower than the morning peak suggests.
  3. Space is distributed unevenly Some floors are consistently over-used while others sit empty. Areas near the entrance, coffee station, or natural light feel crowded. The problem isn't always total capacity — it's that capacity isn't understood or distributed properly.

What changes when you measure properly

Organizations that replace booking data with sensor-based presence data consistently find more room to optimize than expected. Notino worked with Spaceti to measure real desk utilization and found they could fit 15% more employees into the same footprint — while still dedicating 20% of the office to quiet zones and focus areas.

What is a healthy utilization rate?

Most workplace strategists consider 60–75% average utilization across the working week to be the healthy target range. Below 50% consistently suggests significant over-provisioning. Above 80% consistently means people will start struggling to find space.

The CBRE global average of 53% in 2026 suggests most organizations have room to either consolidate space or improve how existing space is activated — or both.

Share article

Key Takeaways

  • Global average office utilization in 2026 is 53% (CBRE) — most offices are empty nearly half the working day
  • Ghost bookings and peak-hour arrivals create a systematic gap between how full an office feels and how full it actually is
  • Booking data measures intent; sensor data measures reality — only one is accurate
  • The healthy target range for desk utilization is 60–75% across the working week
  • Organizations that measure real utilization consistently find more optimization opportunity than expected

Sources

  1. CBRE — 2026 Global Workplace & Occupancy Insights
  2. Cushman & Wakefield — Q4 2025 US Office MarketBeat
  3. Marcus & Millichap — Office Market Commentary 2025
  4. Spaceti — Notino Case Study

Want to learn more? Schedule a demo with us now to see the benefits in action!

Related articles

What Is an All-in-One Smart Building Platform?

An all-in-one smart building platform is a single system that combines occupancy monitoring, energy management, and workplace experience tools — replacing the fragmented mix of separate sensors, dashboards, and vendor contracts that most enterprise facilities teams currently manage.

Top Integrated Smart Building Platforms with Sensors

The top integrated smart building platforms with sensors are systems that combine their own physical sensor hardware with a software platform — covering occupancy, energy, and environmental data in one place. Platforms with native sensors outperform software-only tools because the hardware and software are designed to work together, reducing integration failures and data gaps.

Best Smart Building Software for Enterprise Portfolios

The best smart building software for enterprise portfolios manages multiple buildings from a single dashboard, combining occupancy, energy, and workplace experience data without requiring separate systems per site. The key criteria are multi-site scalability, native sensor hardware, open API integration with existing systems, and granular analytics.

Why Smart Building Software Fails at Enterprise Scale

Smart building software projects most commonly fail at enterprise scale due to three causes: fragmented system architecture that prevents data from being shared, hardware that works in pilot conditions but not across full portfolios, and organizations that have data but no defined process for acting on it.

Why Enterprises Struggle to Manage Multiple Smart Building Software Tools

Enterprises struggle to manage multiple smart building tools because each generates data in a different format, on a different schedule, through a different interface — making it impossible to get a consistent view of portfolio performance without significant manual effort to reconcile what should be a single picture.